Statement from Blacks for Political and Social Action of Dane County: Verdict Outrageous
For the last year or so, and certainly the last few weeks, we have been watching or have become aware of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. He was accused of illegally carrying a gun across state lines, killing two individuals, while injuring a third.
As you have no doubt heard, Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of every charge that he faced today, even the lesser included offenses.
The verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse case is an lamentable but expected outcome in a criminal justice system and society that still operates as the “separate but equal” doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson is controlling law. The verdict is a blow to those waiting in the society to deliver justice on behalf of those who lost their lives as they peacefully assembled to protest against police brutality and violence.
Rittenhouse's decision to cross state lines to Kenosha, totting and brandishing a gun to provoke protestors, was unwarranted.
What is more, the outcome of this case sets a dangerous precedent for those who wish to silence our cries for freedom and equality.
The verdict is a reminder that we have a justice system that presents different outcomes based on the race of the accused.
In the wake of this appalling verdict, we must continue to work to ensure that those who seek to harm progress do not find refuge for their illicit acts in a system meant to protect victims.
If you have questions for us, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
David A. Hart, Esq., President
Kirbie G. Mack, Vice President
BPSADC, Inc.
Letter to the Editor
Beware of False Advertising
Dear Editor,
As a student in France, my medical coverage was completely covered through French Social Security. Later when visiting relatives in Australia, our toddler was treated cost free at a Sydney hospital. When we asked about the cost there, they said “We know how bad it is in the USA, here it’s all covered.” In Germany on a Sunday in 2016, my husband’s treatment at an emergency clinic only cost $58.
This leads to the questions: Why is it so different here, and in which other advanced countries, where government does control medical costs, do people lose their homes or go bankrupt because of medical costs? Nowhere!
We’ve seen many TV ads lately warning us that if our government controls medical costs, we will lose access to treatments and will experience delays “like Canada”. If that is so, why do busloads of Americans go north to buy prescription drugs they can’t afford here? Other ads lie about government wanting to raise drug prices.
Biden wants to lower our medical costs, and pass legislation to make expensive drugs like insulin affordable for all who need them. However, legislators who receive campaign donations from the pharmaceutical companies that pay for those ads, refuse to cooperate. Those same companies spend roughly $10.5 billion annually on such advertising and campaign donations to some of those legislators.
Our laws allow pharmaceutical firms to make obscene profits, supposedly deserved, due to their investment in research. Then they cling to their patents and tax exemptions, avoiding competition from generics for years beyond what is justified. Truth is, much of that research is covered by work done through grants to universities, and our taxes that support them.
Politicians need to listen to us, their constituents, and not be swayed by pharmaceutical companies! Let your voice be heard: Tell them you want the laws changed, so we can all enjoy what other advanced nations have! Whom do you believe? Greedy drug companies or our struggling neighbors?
Kay Ziegahn
Richland Center
