

| Vol. 4 No. 16 August 6, 2009 Archives |
2009 Production Schedule We also accept Online-Only Ads at discounted rates! *********** Subscription Information: The Capital City Hues 612 Christianson Ave., Madison, WI 53714-1533 ($45 a year) Contact Number: (608) 241-2000 Advertising: Claire G. Mendoza sales@capitalcityhues.com |

| It’s hard to turn the television on these days without seeing an ad about the current health care reform debate. The ads have been using some pretty shrill tactics that hardly inform the viewer. In seems as if they have been designed to confuse the viewer or at least give him or her a big headache so that they tune out of the debate. It appears that the shrillness is working. In a recent poll, 52 percent of Americans were found to disapprove of the way that President Obama has handled the health care reform issue while 39 percent approve. There is a lot of money involved in leaving the health care mess the way it is. $2.5 trillion — the amount we spend on health care each year — is a lot of money and there will be winners and losers if health care reform is passed. Apparently, there are some people who aren’t going down without a fight. I know that I am one small business person who needs health care reform desperately. The cost of my present premium is about 45 percent of my gross salary. And I heard through the grapevines that we are to expect about a nine percent increaser next year. Can you believe it? A nine percent increase during a time when we have had almost deflation in this country. Due to the recession, I know that I will have to freeze my ad process at 2009 levels because that is the way it is during a recession. And yet I may be facing a nine percent increase. That’s outrageous. I will probably have to join the ranks of over 46 million other people in this country — and I’m sure the number is climbing every day — who don’t have health insurance. I’m lucky to be healthy, but one never knows how long that lucky streak will last. These spiraling costs reflect capitalism at its worse. This unfettered health insurance market keeps pricing more and more people out of the market, who then have to use the most expensive forms of health care — the emergency room — to survive. This in turn forces another round of increases to cover the costs of those people while millions of others find out they are effectively uninsured because of clauses in their contracts that prohibit pre-existing conditions, “experimental” procedures, “diagnostic” as opposed to preventative tests and so on. Now I know that health care reform is not going to solve everything. I don’t expect my premiums to go down after reform is passed. But I do expect that my rate of increase will go down dramatically so that the percent of our economy spent on health care remains roughly 15 percent. In order to be assured that health care reform is really happening as opposed to the health care powers that be bending with the wind before snapping the present system back in place once the winds of health care change stop blowing; I feel we need a strong public option. That’s right, I feel there is a role for the federal government to play in the financing of health care. The federal government does a pretty decent job with Medicare and I understand that the administrative costs are around 3-8 percent, depending on which costs one is considering. This number in most analyses is lower than the private sector. What I like about the strong public option is that it is public. All of its records are open to public inspection. The process is relatively transparent. And I as a voter and citizen have more control or influence over my health care than I do as a private citizen. I know some would disagree, but that is how I feel. I believe that an efficiently-run public option will keep costs down. I can’t help but wonder how a health care provider is already anticipating that costs will go up by nine percent. I sometimes wonder what role trade journals play in the rise of health insurance costs. In the old days of anti-trust, large players in an industry would physically get together to collude on setting prices thereby effectively eliminating competition. Nowadays, it seems that the speculation in trade journals has the same effect. Educated individuals speculate on what the price is going to be and it gives the companies a target for their price increases. Again, market forces are muted. I can’t say if the level and quality of care will go up with a public option. I would hope that health care reform will create an even playing field as it relates to how pre-existing conditions are handled. I would hope that health care reform will lead to less paper work on the part of the physicians, nurses and other health care professional who are involved and allow them to focus more on quality patient care regardless of where the insurance comes from. A strong public option will be a plus for the health care industry. It will keep the for-profit insurers honest in their yearly increases. It will help introduce innovations in health care management. And while you can’t believe everything the federal government tells you, I believe a lot more of it than I do the shrill, fear mongering television commercials. A lot more information and less shouting please! |
Debate over health care reform heats up THE TIME IS NOW! |
| Reflections/Jonathan Gramling A public option is a must! |

Stories & Columns The 2009 Money Conference/Ronnie Warner: Entertainment enterpreneur (Part 1 of 2), by Jonathan Gramling African Association of Madison's 11th Annual Africa Fest: Fulfillment of excellence, by Jonathan Gramling Simple Things: Power, by Lang Kenneth Haynes National Medical Association’s Dr. Willarda Edwards: Weighing in on reform, by Jonathan Gramling Asian Wisconzine: WWOCN leadership confab on surviving a tough economy (1), by Heidi M. Pascual The steep cost of cheap food: Obesity and diabetes threaten children of color, by Dr. Eva Vivian CENTERSPREAD: • True African Community • African family reunion, by Jonathan Gramling Second Annual AKA Walk It Out: Take control of your health, by Jonathan Gramling China Dispatch: Welcome to Nanning, by Andrew Gramling Kidlinks World's Fourth Annual Africa Alive Letter to the Editor: MEDICARE birthday |
EDITORIAL STAFF Jonathan Gramling Publisher & Editor Heidi Manabat Managing Editor Clarita G. Mendoza Sales Manager Contributing Writers Paul Barrows, Alfonso Zepeda Capistran, Fabu, Andrew Gramling, Lang Kenneth Haynes, Heidi Pascual, Jessica Pharm, Laura Salinger, Jessica Strong, & Martinez White Webmaster: Heidi @ managing.editor@capitalcityhues.com |